Skip to content
SAINT-CHARLES-DE-BOURGET · INVESTOR PLANNING

Read the investment alongside the co-owner agreement

USAvisa field guide · 2 minute read Reviewed 7 September 2026

Read the general investor planning overview

THE SHORT ANSWER

A Saint-Charles-de-Bourget investor should connect committed funds with the actual ownership and governance rights acquired. The first review should create a closing checklist that separates ownership, control, source of funds, commitments and business viability. The investor must decide whether to sign, fund or renegotiate the transaction only after the documents can show the enterprise that will exist at filing. A projected purchase is less persuasive than records showing what has actually been acquired and what risk has been accepted.

01

Separate price, nationality and direction

E-2 requires treaty nationality, at least 50% relevant national enterprise ownership and the applicant’s ability to develop and direct. A larger share purchase price does not alone establish practical authority. Read voting rights, management provisions and reserved decisions together, and explain material veto rights rather than rely only on a simplified ownership percentage. Follow the money from its lawful origin through each account into the enterprise and read the financing documents for who bears the loss. Then test the operating plan against real costs, customers and staffing needs. The decision is not simply how much to spend; it is whether the committed amount is substantial relative to this business and whether the enterprise can be shown not to be marginal.

02

Retain the substantive enterprise and capital requirements

There is no fixed E-2 minimum or ten-job quota. Substantial lawful capital must be traced and genuinely at risk in a real nonmarginal enterprise, exceeding minimal investor-family support or meeting the applicable significant economic-contribution standard. Assess actual escrow and financing terms; a promised future amendment to governance should not be presented as an effective change before its conditions are fulfilled. Hypothetical example: A zero-waste detergent refill shop has paid a supplier deposit but may recover it unconditionally if the owner changes their mind. The owner must decide whether to alter the contract, make other qualifying commitments, or wait, because an amount left freely recoverable may not demonstrate the needed exposure to loss. The share register and operating agreement must separately show relevant treaty-national ownership and the investor’s ability to direct the shop.

SOURCE NOTES

Editorial source review: 2026-09-07. General preparation guidance, not an individual assessment.

SAINT-CHARLES-DE-BOURGET · INVESTOR PLANNING

Your next conversation, from Saint-Charles-de-Bourget.

Bring your questions about work, business or family plans. Explore the guides at your own pace, then discuss the evidence and professional advice appropriate to your circumstances.

Speak with the USAvisa team
A CONVERSATION IS A GOOD PLACE TO START.

WHAT’S YOUR
NEXT CHAPTER?

Tell us where you are today.
Let’s talk about where you want to go.

Book a free consultation Or call +1 581 221 6920