Skip to content
PROGRAMME BRIEFING · BÉGINBégin

A new route.Know the details.

A Bégin applicant receiving an official request for more information should identify the exact issue, deadline and response channel before preparing an answer. A quick acknowledgment or a payment receipt may be relevant without answering the substantive request. A first review should separate the screening record, the underlying EB-1 or EB-2 basis, the identity of each proposed beneficiary and the official payment instruction. The decision is whether the response addresses the actual notice with documentary support, rather than treating a public description of the programme as a substitute for case-specific requirements. Hypothetical example: A museum conservation executive receives a request concerning an earlier professional award; the applicant must decide whether the issuing organization’s original record answers the issue before paying or submitting unrelated material.

Talk about GOLD CARD
Official individual contributionUS$1 million
DHS processing feeUS$15,000
Review date7 September 2026

Start with the GOLD CARD eligibility and application overview

01

Answer the issue that was actually raised

Use the genuine request and available evidence rather than assume every inquiry concerns the same subject. Gold Card retains EB-1/EB-2 eligibility, admissibility and visa availability requirements; paying a charge does not waive them. If information is unavailable, identify the real gap and applicable procedure without inventing evidence or assuming a request for clarification pauses a deadline. Build a notice-response matrix showing each request, its deadline, the exact evidence available and any point that needs explanation. This avoids two common errors: sending a receipt when eligibility proof is requested, or assuming a general programme statement resolves admissibility. The reader must decide whether the evidence establishes the claimed EB category and whether visa availability has been checked for the relevant case. An official request should be answered through its stated channel with complete, consistent records.

02

Keep charges and family eligibility explicit

Published processing is US$15,000 nonrefundable per person. After successful vetting, the officially instructed gift is US$1 million for an individual principal or US$2 million for a corporate principal. Every eligible included spouse or child adds US$1 million and US$15,000, including corporate cases. Children generally must be unmarried and under 21, with case-specific CSPA review. The gift is not EB-5 capital or an equity purchase, and no payment guarantees approval, repayment or timing. Keep the payment decision separate from a conventional investment analysis. The instructed gift is paid by the applicant to the U.S. government after the applicable vetting stage; it is not a conventional visa and it is not a purchase of equity or a return-bearing asset. Confirm the principal type and every eligible family member before relying on a stated total, because the required amounts and processing charges can differ by case. A bank transfer, payment reference or adviser invoice cannot by itself establish that all immigration requirements have been satisfied.

03

Follow the official payment sequence and individual amounts

The framework operates through existing employment-based permanent residence classifications rather than creating a new one, with successful applicants proceeding under the first or second employment-based preference. When instructions conflict, independently access the official portal and the government contact route identified in verified correspondence. The published terms attach a recurring annual maintenance charge and a further charge on transfer, with transfer requiring a new background check, so the sponsoring company takes on a commitment returning every year and a decision point whenever the arrangement moves. Re-verify the current official terms directly before transferring anything: the amounts, the payee, the sequence of vetting and payment, and what happens on refusal. Third-party summaries tend to describe the program as a fast visa, which it is not; the official material describes a gift-based framework with its own process. A first review should produce a funds-availability chart that distinguishes an anticipated distribution from money held by the applicant and from money that can lawfully be transferred when official payment instructions arrive. Put each proposed payment in a ledger identifying the payer, recipient, amount, purpose, refund rule and instruction authorizing it. A sponsor, employer or bank can assist with logistics only after the payment source, applicant responsibility and official instructions are clear.

SOURCES FOR THIS GUIDE

Sources reviewed 2026-09-07. This guide covers a preparation focus; it is not an individual eligibility assessment.

GOLD CARD · BÉGIN

YOUR QUESTIONS.
A CLEARER START.

KEEP EXPLORING

A LITTLE MORE CLARITY.