Read it.
Use it.
Focused guides for the questions that need more than a quick answer. Each includes a worksheet to prepare your next conversation.
Guides for your next decision.
Build a TN employer evidence brief before drafting the letter
Read & prepare Applicant planningKeep an L-1A new-office record from approval to extension
Read & prepare Applicant planningCompare the E-2 evidence for a startup and a business purchase
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for New York State
Read & prepare U.S. destination planningCanadian RN planning for California
Read & prepareSeven decisions, answered before you prepare.
Verify credential conferral before treating the TN file as ready
For a Bégin professional, waiting for a printed diploma is a different issue from still waiting to earn the required qualification. The first review should result in a dated checklist of the profession, actual duties, citizenship record, qualification evidence and employment terms. The key decision is whether the candidate can truthfully request classification now or should wait for a missing primary record. Hypothetical example: A geochemist has an electronic degree confirmation but no printed diploma; the applicant must decide whether the confirmation proves the award and whether the job duties match the selected profession before travel.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Ask the institution the precise question
- Connect that evidence to the actual profession
Separate Canadian residence from the qualifying US route
A Bégin resident should establish citizenship and the real work or investment facts before relying on a programme label. A first review should produce separate records for immigration status, nationality, employer or enterprise ownership, investment source and intended work. The concrete decision is which route is actually available to the person, rather than which label seems closest to Canadian residence. Hypothetical example: A pastry wholesaler holds Canadian permanent residence and another nationality from an E-2 treaty country; the investor must decide whether the nationality and ownership records support E-2, rather than assuming the Canadian card is relevant.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Do not use an address as nationality evidence
- Assess the other routes on their own facts
Explain staffing assumptions without importing an EB-5 quota
A Bégin investor can show how the business operates through different demand periods while keeping E-2 investment and nonmarginality requirements distinct. A first review should trace the source and movement of funds, classify every expenditure as committed or still controllable, and test the operating forecast against documents. The concrete decision is whether to make further commitments before applying or to change transaction terms that leave the investment too reversible. Hypothetical example: A commercial laundry pickup business has signed vehicle leases but can cancel its service-depot agreement without cost; the investor must decide whether the current risk-bearing commitments are substantial for this enterprise.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Use a credible operating timeline
- Document capital already committed on genuine terms
Show individual authority and actual launch capacity
For a Bégin company, a committee charter needs to be connected with the person’s duties and the US operation’s real support. A first review should assemble the foreign employment timeline, corporate relationship documents, premises record, staffing plan and evidence of the proposed US role. The concrete decision is whether the operation can support a qualifying L-1 position after its initial launch period, not merely whether a new entity has been registered. Hypothetical example: An aquaculture equipment company leases a small workspace and plans to transfer its operations lead; the company must decide whether its hiring and revenue plan leaves that person primarily directing the office rather than performing routine installation.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Identify the role and foreign qualifying history
- Use operating facts rather than only corporate documents
Compare management evidence with the business’s investment case
A Bégin applicant should assess actual corporate duties and capital commitments rather than choose a route from an attractive forecast alone. A first review should compare two evidence trails: corporate ownership and foreign employment for L-1, against nationality, committed capital and operating risk for E-2. The concrete decision is which existing facts can be proved now, not which category has the more appealing business forecast. Hypothetical example: A software localization studio has a related foreign company and funds for a US launch; its founder must decide whether documented prior employment and a qualifying corporate relationship support L-1, or whether the investment record and ownership support E-2.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Follow the employee’s genuine role
- Follow the investor’s real commitments
Plan family permissions separately from academic and business deadlines
Bégin households should identify what each person is actually permitted to do instead of treating the principal’s pending milestone as permission for everyone. A first review should identify every family member’s relationship evidence, age, marital status, current classification and intended activity. The concrete decision is whether each person has independent permission for the planned work, study or travel, rather than assuming the principal’s filing controls everyone’s rights. Hypothetical example: An architectural acoustics consultant expects a spouse to answer client emails during a US project; the household must decide whether the spouse has appropriate work-authorized status before any services begin.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Check work rights before filling a practical gap
- Respond to each family member’s own requirements
Read the actual obligation behind a forecast or request
A Bégin investor should distinguish a project’s anticipated exit from the government’s actual request for evidence or payment. A first review should place the EB-5 capital source, project documents, job evidence, conditional-residence timeline and Gold Card notice in separate folders. The concrete decision is whether the applicant is pursuing an investment-based immigrant route or responding to an official gift process tied to a qualifying EB category. Hypothetical example: A renewable packaging developer has an EB-5 subscription offer and a Gold Card request for information; the applicant must decide which record answers each route instead of presenting the project subscription as proof of Gold Card eligibility.
WHAT THIS GUIDE COVERS
- Separate EB-5 forecasts from investor rights
- Answer Gold Card requests within their real scope
- Use the actual immigration events for residence planning