U.S. visa support in Saint-Ambroise. YOURAMERICANDREAM.

Not on that footing. TN is for a Canadian citizen taking up prearranged professional work for another party, in a profession listed in USMCA Appendix 2, satisfying that profession's own degree, licence or experience requirement; self-employment in the United States is not permitted, and a stake in the prospective employer must be disclosed and will be examined against that rule. Hypothetical example: a veterinarian who incorporates a small-animal clinic in Maine and holds every share of it is proposing to work for herself whatever the offer letter says, while the same veterinarian engaged by a clinic she has no interest in, holding the state licence her profession requires, is an ordinary professional case.

Not by itself, and the answer turns on control rather than on holding shares. The L categories test the relationship between the two employers — parent, branch, subsidiary or affiliate, both actively doing business — together with one continuous year of qualifying employment abroad within the three years before the petition. Two companies owned and controlled by the same individual, or by the same group of individuals each holding approximately the same share of each, can qualify as affiliates; a minority interest in two commercially unrelated businesses does not by itself create the relationship, and a trading relationship between them is not the test. Where the relationship genuinely exists, an L-1A role must be primarily managerial or executive, and an L-1B role must rest on specialised knowledge of that company's own product, process or procedures rather than on skill any competent practitioner would have.

It does not touch the nationality tests. TN is open to citizens of Canada and Mexico, and E-2 treaty nationality is a citizenship question twice over: for the investor personally and for the ownership of the enterprise itself. A permanent resident card substitutes for neither, and permanent residence and citizenship remain separate facts however long the residence has lasted. Ownership can decide which route fits once nationality is satisfied; until then it decides nothing, and the useful move is to fix the sequence rather than argue the stake.

No. A share certificate is not work authorisation, and each family member's route follows what that person will actually do. Spouses of L-1 and E-2 principals are employment-authorized incident to their status; dependants holding TD status may study but may not work; and an unmarried child's eligibility as a derivative ends at twenty-one. Write each person's intended activity on its own line, match it to the status that permits that activity, and treat the age limit as a planning date rather than a surprise.